Fordthought
  • Blog
  • Word of the Week
  • Dig Deeper

w/c 29/09/13: Assertion

28/9/2014

 


Something declared or stated positively, often with no support or attempt at proof.


Picture
PictureSaracens - the best team in England?
This week’s WotW is for my year 10 students - however might as easily apply for many of my year 11 “All Stars” as well! They recently made their first attempts at IGSCE exam questions – the “describe” questions went well enough, but the “explain” and “evaluate” still have some way to go! It’s not that they did not know their evidence, bible quotes, Christian teachings, logical objections etc. it was just that they failed to deploy them! In short, there were too many assertions!

An assertion is a positive statement that lacks support or reasons. We make them all the time in everyday life and most of the time they cause no problem; “The Earth is round”; “Light travels faster than sound”; “Saracens are the best Rugby team in England”. These statements are widely accepted (especially the last one in my household!) and so don’t require us to offer any evidence to support them. Indeed, life would be rather tedious if we had to justify such statements every time we made them.


Picture
However in Philosophy and Ethics we have to be very wary of assertions; they have the potential to make arguments seem better than they really are and should be avoided if we want to be sure of persuading someone of our case. In equal measure it is the job of a critical thinker to spot when someone has made an assertion and challenge them for their reasoning and evidence. Many students forget this fact, especially when the subject of the debate is something which is well established such as a societal taboo or religious tradition (see the previous word of the week; Irrelevant Appeals).

In the last 100 years many philosophers have developed ideas around where the “burden of proof” lies and have generally concluded that it always lies with the person making the claim. One famous example of such a philosopher is Bertrand Russell and his celestial teapot. This is an analogy which tries to demonstrate why the philosophic burden of proof is always with those making the claim, rather than shifting it onto those who would dispute the claim. 


Russell claims that this is what religious people have a tendency to do; to say that the sceptic has a duty to prove the theist wrong. To show the absurdity of this Russell said that if he claimed that there was a teapot orbiting the Sun, somewhere between the Earth and Mars, it is nonsensical to expect others to believe him on the grounds that they cannot prove him wrong. 

In an article titled "Is There a God?" commissioned, but never published, by Illustrated magazine in 1952, Russell wrote:
Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time. (Russell, 1952)
So this week when you are making an argument or writing an essay have a think about where the burden of proof really lies and if it is up to you to prove the point you are making. Thinking about assertions will not only get you more marks in an exam but much more importantly will make you into a better thinker.


Have I made any assertions in this post?


References:

Russell, Bertrand. "Is There a God? [1952]" (PDF). The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11: Last Philosophical Testament, 1943–68. Routledge. pp. 547–548. Retrieved 28 September 2014.
Picture

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Absolutism
    Agnostic
    Analogy
    Apophatic
    A Priori
    Aquinas
    Article
    Assisted Dying
    Banking
    Bertrand Russell
    Book Review
    Buddhism
    Christianity
    Covenant
    Dawkins
    Design
    Diaspora
    Dig Deeper
    Epiphany
    Equality
    Euthanasia
    Existentialism
    Fallacies
    False Dichotomy
    Family
    Fertility
    Genesis
    Hajj
    Higher Education
    Holocaust
    Hospice
    Human Rights
    Human-rights
    Hume
    Islam
    ISRSA
    Justice
    JWT
    Life After Death
    Love
    Martyr
    Messiah
    MOOC
    Narnia
    NDE
    News
    Nirvana
    Ontological
    Plato
    PPE
    Pro Choice
    Pro-Choice
    Pro Life
    Pro-Life
    Prophet
    Reformation
    Relativism
    Religion
    Rights
    Science Vs Religion
    Secularisation
    Sport
    Stewardship
    Surrogacy
    Teleological
    Temple
    Ten Commandments
    Theology
    Viability
    Via Negativa
    Warfare
    Wittgenstein
    Word
    Word Of The Week
    Word-of-the-week

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.